• meco03211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        It is actually true though. Just the FAA’s definition of “near collision” is much much looser than what a lay person would think.

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I mean it is true, it’s just “near collisions” has a broad definition in terms of air safety. Things that are very low risk or potential problems that were simply resolved before they grew are still recorded.

        • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          No. The top comments already explain why the article is wrong.

        • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          He is just worried that HIS “actually” wouldn’t stand out as nicely if someone added second one…