• Potato_in_my_anus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’ve been paying Amazon for more than 25 years just for the free deliveries. I don’t watch anything on Prime, it’s so hard to navigate between the free and rent videos. Been torrenting since the 90s, yeah I’m old, so my advice stands -get a good VPN, and sail the seven seas-

    • ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      BitTorrents initial release was in July of 2001. You were not torrenting since the 90s. In the 90s we were still on Napster, soulseek, Usenet, and IRC. Limewire, DirectConnect, and The Pirate Bay wouldn’t come around until into the 2000s. I used BitTorrent mostly to get actual Linux ISOs at first because it was better than downloading for several days only to discover at the end that your md5sum checked bad. The pirating came later once the trackers got a better selection than the competing protocols.

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Meh, I’d consider Emule and Napster type things torrenting.

        I don’t recall if they used peering though. I thought they did (twas a long time ago).

        • Prophet Zarquon@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          The Kademlia network (eMule, Kazaalite, etc), did indeed use a global P2P Distributed Hash Table, to resolve which IPs hosted which content, which the torrent protocol also does … some of:

          Unlike the mainline torrent protocol, Kademlia’s DHT (like the modern-day Tribler DHT), also resolved filenames to content, allowing in-app search.

          With torrents, one needs to consult a DHT crawler, or an index site (which sucks; centrally operated sites are fragile, compared to DHTs), whereas eMule & more contemporarily Tribler, have two layers of DHT, enabling decentralized search without relyiance on someone having created a listing at some particular site & that site being online to search its index.

          • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Thanks for the background.

            Been a while since I used emule (surprised I remember it!), and I honestly didn’t know the details even then (I was lazy and it worked).

        • ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          eMule was introduced in 2002, which is again NOT THE 90s. Napster also uses a very different protocol, without any of the distributed file sharing. With P2P like Napster, soulseek, and DirectConnect you downloaded a complete file from one person only. Once you had it and could share it, someone could get it from you. But downloading bits of the same file from multiple peers at once was not a thing until after BitTorrent’s release in 2001.

          • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Thanks.

            It’s been a while (was working in a call center back then, plenty of bandwidth), but my memory sucks. Lol