If anything, cannabis seems like a much better (and more profitable) drug around which to build a leisurely establishment.

  • Pat12@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    right but my point is if a group of friends want to go to a bar and some people don’t smoke or like the smell of smoke then there is a problem, it’s not like they can just opt not to smell smoke

    • JickleMithers@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      …that’s why you would only go to a place like that if everyone is down. Having them for people that want to go is fine, no one is forced to go.

      • WhiteHawk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        That sounds nice in theory, but in reality the result is usually that if the majority of a group smokes, the nonsmokers don’t have much of a choice except for looking for new friends. That was a very common complaint when smoking in pubs and restaurants was still legal here.

        • JickleMithers@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just because one person doesn’t want to go to something doesn’t mean they shouldn’t exist. You’re basically saying one person’s opinion/choice outweighs an entire group. If those choices constantly put you at odds with the group it might be best to find a group that aligns with your values more. There’s also nothing wrong with being friends with the people that want to go to things you don’t like, just tag along when they do things you do like. You also don’t have to have one set of friends, you can have multiple groups that like to do different things. I’m not pro banning things for the sake of others that can choose not to participate.