Cheems@lemmy.world to Movies@lemmy.world · edit-21 year agoTalks about 28 years later a third instalment to 28 days/weeks moviesmovieweb.comexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down11
arrow-up13arrow-down1external-linkTalks about 28 years later a third instalment to 28 days/weeks moviesmovieweb.comCheems@lemmy.world to Movies@lemmy.world · edit-21 year agomessage-square8fedilink
minus-squareCeeBee@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoNo worries. A better title might be something like: “MovieWeb article on a potential to 28 Days Later” It’s best to be descriptive and concise. Don’t make it vague or try to be clever to entice someone by piquing their interest. The point of posting these links to sites like Lemmy/Reddit is to get past the click-baity stuff for each other.
minus-squareWarmSoda@lemm.eecakelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoWhy not just “28 Years Later? 28 Days Later Director & Writer Tease Potential Third Installment”
No worries. A better title might be something like:
“MovieWeb article on a potential to 28 Days Later”
It’s best to be descriptive and concise. Don’t make it vague or try to be clever to entice someone by piquing their interest.
The point of posting these links to sites like Lemmy/Reddit is to get past the click-baity stuff for each other.
Why not just “28 Years Later? 28 Days Later Director & Writer Tease Potential Third Installment”