• RealFknNito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’ve met people who say things that should have a sarcastic inflection - without the inflection.

    Yes, it’s very hard to understand if they’re joking and yes, we sometimes have to ask them if they’re kidding, but not all the time. Some things are so absurd, so outlandish, phrased in such a way that explicitly explaining it was a joke can ruin the joke. Yes, clear communication in some instances should take priority over the joke in cases where being misunderstood as serious would have consequences, social or otherwise.

    But I really don’t think anyone here reasonably believed OP valued a phone with a ten year lifespan over the life of a child, nor that we should be using a foreign country as a waste dump until they’re ‘at capacity’. I think at some point you have to make the determination that something is so absurd that even if you can’t tell it’s sarcasm, you should be able to tell they’re not serious.

    • soloner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Would sarcasm without inflection be the same as deadpan? So maybe without the /s it’s deadpan and with the /s it’s sarcasm? :P

      This has been a fun conversation to read. Such nuance.

    • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      And this still doesn’t account for the nutcases that say this stuff, actually believing it, and then get showered with validation because the rest of us assume it is sarcasm.

      Edit: whether someone is being “too unreasonable to be serious” is unfortunately no longer a reliable way to tell what someone is actually trying to say.

        • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Hardly.

          I’m saying satire that doesn’t in some way tell you it’s satire, can’t be distinguished from the genuinely delusional.

          And thereby the way satire tells you it is satire, needs to change. No part of the art requires that there be no way to truly tell, I would argue the opposite.

    • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Agreed, but again, let’s not pretend r/fuckthes has a point in it being dumb and unnecessary.

      Using it removes even the slightest room for misinterpretation. That is always a good thing.

      • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        A large majority of the internet is dumb and unnecessary.

        Jokes often rely on you being able to figure them out without explicit explanation, giving room for misinterpretation.

        Removing the potential for misinterpretation is not always a good thing.