• Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    I was going to say the same thing. Maybe these are the especially shitty jets that are even shittier than their normal shitty jets?

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      SU-35s are legemdarily good like their older SU-27 brothers. They’re arguably the best Gen 4 aircraft in the world now. In general,.Soviet and Russian aircraft have been very formidable.

      What you’re confusing “shittier” with is after Sukhoi hand the aircraft over to the Russian military. At which point poor selection and training hop in, strapped with janky or old weaponry, given orders by notoriously bad tacticians. And suddenly your fancy “Gen 4.5” aircraft is getting downed by anything with a half modern missile in the tube.

      Toe-to-toe it’ll be Israel’s F-16s—which will need modern configs—that will present a challenge. Certainly not the F-15s. But the real contender will be SAMs which I imagine are the latest fancy American ones.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Israel has 36 F-35s. You can argue about the cost efficiency of the design if you want, but the actual result will be a bunch of dead SU-35s, not a fight between roughly equivalent Gen 4 fighters.

        Also, just saying, the American Generation 4.5 was the F-18, not the F-16. The F-16s were originally designed in 1976 (and America didn’t sell the F-18s to everyone, while the F-16 is still arguably America’s main fighter export)

        The Super Hornets in particular are noted for being an actual 4.5 frame, sharing a lot of design features that would come to distinguish genuine Gen 5 fighters.

        Only Australia and Kuwait, for some reason, were allowed to buy those sexy beasts.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          The F-16s and F-15s have 4.5 versions though. They aren’t stuck in the 1970’s anymore than the F-18 Super is stuck in the 1990’s.

          • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            Fair enough! There’s no getting around the fact that the Hornets can load up a lot more ordinance and has better avionics just from being a bigger frame with more thrust, but the F-16s do have a baseline speed and maneuvering advantage.

        • Jaytreeman@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          The issue with Israel isn’t the quality of their weapons and munitions. It’s the quantity.
          This article explains how they don’t have many fighter pilots
          Israel has something like 35000 people in it’s air force. That’s a tiny air force. Most of those people are going to be in some type of support role. The article talks about the most elite squadron being only 40 people. Losing one person is arguably a bigger loss than the plane. After all, doesn’t matter if you have a plane if no one can fly it

          • Vikthor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Israel has something like 35000 people in it’s air force. That’s a tiny air force.

            That’s very relative. While it may seem tiny from US or Chinese POV it’s more than the whole militaries of many European nations even twice as big as Israel.

          • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Oh, that’s interesting, I didn’t know that, but those 40 would be the guys flying the 36 F-35s, you know? They’re just not going to lose that many of them to SU-35S.

            And they can protest the Palestinian genocide, because Hamas doesnt have an air force, but if Iran starts sending in bombing missions they’ll be in the air.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Well… yes and no. Anything made in Russia over the last 2 years likely has electronics that are rather suspect. I wouldn’t be shocked to learn that some of those new flankers Iran is getting have some repurposed Whirlpool dishwasher chips squirreled away in there somewhere.