Recall: Stealing everything you’ve ever typed or viewed on your own Windows PC is now possible.
doublepulsar.com
Photographic memory comes to Windows, and is the biggest security setback in a decade.

Q. Is this really as harmful as you think?

A. Go to your parents house, your grandparents house etc and look at their Windows PC, look at the installed software in the past year, and try to use the device. Run some antivirus scans. There’s no way this implementation doesn’t end in tears — there’s a reason there’s a trillion dollar security industry, and that most problems revolve around malware and endpoints.

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    11·
    27 days ago

    I did an interview where the candidate said that if it’s one line, it runs in constant time. And they were completely serious. And this was in the context of Python list comprehensions.

    They claimed this ran in constant time:

    new_list = [value for value in my_list]

    Whereas this ran in linear time:

    new_list = []
for value in my_list:
    new_list.append(value)

    We asked clarifying questions, like what happens to the runtime if the list gets really large, and they doubled down.

    And this was for a senior Python dev position… No, they didn’t get the job.

    • suction@lemmy.worldEnglish
      11·
      27 days ago

      Runs in constant time doesn’t ring a bell to be honest…do you mean instantly?

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        11·
        27 days ago

        No, constant time means it’ll take the same amount of time whether you have 10 items or 10,000.

        A list comprehension will take roughly the same amount of time as a for loop, it’s just syntactic sugar.

        • suction@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1·
          27 days ago

          Thanks!

          Not sure why you needed to downvote my honest question, maybe the candidate dodged a bullet there, he he he.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
            1·
            26 days ago

            I didn’t downvote.

            If this was a junior candidate or something, I may have let it slide. But this was a senior candidate, which means they are supposed to be a technical leader for the team. I can’t have someone in that role with such fundamental misunderstandings. There were more red flags than just that one, I also don’t fail people for one gaff (e.g. I just passed a senior that bombed the coding challenge, but it was obvious they were over-thinking it).