Well that’s awesome! Thanks!
Well that’s awesome! Thanks!
So is this an actual Dragon Age game? An RPG like the original games?
Or is this an overwatch clone dancing on the corpse of the IP?
I had an absolute blast with the farsight gun. But honestly, if they bring it back, I hope they nerf the fuck out of it. Because kids online will be fucking insufferable with it.
Back then, you were playing with your friends in the same room. If one of your friends was being a douche and griefing with it, you could just slap them.
The tough part to recreate is that the multiplayer was so fun because it was innovative. It was one of the first games to do stuff like that.
24 years later, we’ve had a lot of games do a lot of stuff as well.
… But I’d still happily enjoy bringing all of it back, even if it was just a cosmetic facelift.
I get that, but this particular community is about Reddit. You’re gonna see reddit-related content here.
Fun hyperbole, but this all assumes wolves are the only predators.
Nah it’s still the wolf’s fault, even when the shepherd is terrible. Take the wolf out of the equation, and the sheep live regardless of the shepherd’s capabilities.
I do. It’s the last one.
I’m okay with that.
Removed by mod
I dunno, my dude. That’s still quite a reach to go from a simple question to automatically determining that it’s a hatchet job.
I’m not saying you’re wrong, just that you’re assuming a lot more than I normally works from a singular question.
There’s a significant difference between the two questions in your first sentence: quality of verifiability. The goal here is to determine accuracy anyways. Asking that directly will never get you an answer that you should accept at face value.
If I ask “is this accurate?”, any sourceless responses lack weight. “yes” holds as much proof as “no.”
But “has anyone heard of this” is a much lower barrier of veracity. Answers themselves won’t determine the accuracy of the article, just whether or not anyone can help establish credibility.
It’s important to question and verify sources, no matter who it is. Criticizing someone who does makes you no better than anyone pushing propaganda.
What is a problem is fake news.
Indeed. That’s why that user asked the simple question. They’re trying to determine the veracity of the information from that website.
Bias and factuality are different concepts. One source can print wildly biased, yet probably true information. While another can provide absolutely unbiased disinformation.
Yes, Tom. Horrible.
Bambi fucked everyone up at that age.
You should play 1 and 2 before 3 just so you can meet Harold. He’s a goddamn treasure.
You want a toe? I can get you a toe, believe me. There are ways, Dude. You don’t wanna know about it, believe me. Hell, I can get you a toe by 3 o’clock this afternoon… with nail polish.