+1 for LXQt. But what do you mean XFCE is not ready? Never used MATE, so I cannot tell, but XFCE seemed solid when I used it
+1 for LXQt. But what do you mean XFCE is not ready? Never used MATE, so I cannot tell, but XFCE seemed solid when I used it
I’m still trying out different editors from time to time. I always feel like they are lacking in some way in comparison to Emacs. Like, when there’s no key binding to focus the list of references, or one cannot navigate to the beginning of a block, or one cannot navigate by subword. Let’s not forget sexp. Cannot live without it. Or marks, for that matter. Or proper clipboard history that is properly searchable. It’s like the developers has not seen the light yet. Most editors are very mouse driven, and maybe does not focus enough on actual code navigation. I’m biased of course. Though, Helix seems cool.
Side note: Even though I use Emacs, I have nothing against Vim. Heck, I even use it every now and then.
Table locks can be a real pain. You know you need to do the change, but the system is constantly running queries towards it. Now days it’s a bit easier with algorithm=inplace
and lock=none
, but in the good old days you were on your own. Your only friend was luck. Large migrations like that still gives me shivers
Two things pop up
alert()
asking “what the fuck?”. That was mostly laughed upon, so no worry.This state-o-fart user-experience will transport you to the future of user experiences
I admit. This cracked me up.
I really enjoy Mojeek. It gives you results you would not get anywhere else. I see high value in that
Been using Qwant for maybe a year or so. Recently found Swisscows too. I am not sure if Qwant uses their own index. I remember that they said that they were to create their own index, but the results looks suspiciously similar to Bing. Swisscows for sure runs their own index, and I find the results to be rather good
Blockbuster, simply because they (at least used to have) the best pricing, though the app is not very good. Now days I tend to use YouTube more since the prices on Blockbuster has gone up. This is probably a local thing. I guess prices probably differ between diffent regions.
The Brother printer I bought recently was easier to install on Linux than on Mac. I think that says something. Always works too
Over the years XFCE is the DE I’ve used the most. Kept getting back to it. It simply does a lot of things right. That does not mean it’s my favorite, though. There are plenty of good ones out there. LXqt is one I find to be excellent, but it does not get much attention. Enlightenment too, for that matter. Enlightenment feels like it comes from a different era, but it’s quite charming. That said, I think I’m finished with these “small” environments, and will be on KDE from now on. You get the “batteries included” experience, and things generally work very well together. Sure, maybe it’s a bit more resource heavy, but I can’t say I notice.
As a side note, DBeaver actually asks for confirmation if it thinks you are about to do something wonky. I think it’s quite telling just how common this mistake is. We’ve all been there
“flatsnap”. This made my day
I’ve only used Caddy as a reverse proxy in production, but on my development machine I use Caddy with php-fpm. That makes me a bit unsure if I understand your questions correctly.
For me that would look something like this:
test.example.com {
root * var/www/html
php_fastcgi unix//run/php/php7.4-fpm.sock
file_server
}
(Yeah, PHP 7.4, I know)
It looks like your Docker (?) image is exposing the php-fmp socket? I did not even know that was possible, but I don’t doubt it is.
Caddy has no issues serving multiple hosts from the same server, it can even be with different php-fpm sockets. Caddy will just nod at you, maybe silently question your choice of still running PHP 7.4, but it accepts it and runs. Just make another block with a different host in the same Caddyfile, and it will work just fine.
Loved that show! Needed to stop after my anxiety levels went to high though :D
Aha, I see, thank you