You can also do git diff --cached to see all changes you added to the index.

You are only censored on lemmy.ml, not on the rest of the network. You can write whatever you want, but lemmy.ml has no duty to tolerate racists in their house.

While closing this tab I read “snail that eats its own trail”.

https://hexdocs.pm/google_api_content_warehouse/0.4.0/api-reference.html

If you have a fever.

deleted by creator

This non-linear way of storytelling kind of reminds me a bit of Ben Robbins’ Microscope. We begin with a blank slate but we progressively fill in details, going wherever we want to shift our focus next.

Is there any situation where you’d want to remember the opcodes? Disassemblers should give you user-friendly assembly code, without any need to look at the raw numbers. Maybe it’s useful to remember which instructions are pseudo instructions (so you know stuff like jz (jump if zero) being the same as je (jump if equal) making it easier to understand the disassembly), but I don’t think you need to remember the opcode numbers for that.

Edit: Maybe with malware analysis where the malware in question may be obfuscated in interesting ways to make the job of binary analysis harder?

(direct link to the release song) : https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/songs/song39.mp3

What do leaf blowers do that rakes don’t? I don’t remember the last time I saw or heard a leaf blower.

This one, if by unix he also means modern linux systems. Nowadays you can simply use tar xf my-file.tar.whatever and it should work on most linux systems (it worked on every modern linux system I’ve tried and every compressed tar file I’ve tried). I don’t think it is hard to remember the xf part.

deleted by creator

I don’t have a driver’s license, so I’m not knowledgeable in the topic, but aren’t there situations where the decision is deferred to the drivers? For example when 4 drivers of the same class arrive at an intersection without signage at the same time, with each having one of the other drivers to their right, with all of them wanting to go straight ahead, with none of them being a tiebreaker.

they break with monospacedness

The IDEs I’ve used had the ligatures be of the same character width as the original operator.

Why are you casting to void*? How is the compiler supposed to know the size of the data you are dereferencing?

But there are already some: https://lemmy.ml/search?q=ama&type=Communities&listingType=All&page=1&sort=TopAll

What does the process of creating your comics look like? Do you begin by drawing or with the words? Since you have a universe where this takes place and that the images must generally be recognizable as something (ie. it can’t just be an amorphous pile of pixels), I reckon that your mind isn’t entirely free? Or do you begin writing/drawing without the initial intent of posting it on this community, and if the image takes on a shape and reveals something out of Analog Nowhere do you post it on here? Or do you pull the core idea or picture of the comic out of your mind onto the screen, where you fill out the blanks so as to make it real?

Due to its reduced instruction set; it uses less power in general

If that is true I don’t think it can be attributed to it being RISC

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/20298991/does-generally-risc-processors-have-lower-power-consumption-than-cisc-processors

I’ve never played it, but aren’t League of Legends servers already authoritative? Also, I’m pretty sure it would only deal with certain kinds of cheats. An authoritative server won’t be able to prevent a player from using an aimbot, for example, since nothing says that a player isn’t allowed to have super accurate aim. The server can’t tell if they are cheating or just insanely good. Nevermind I missed your sentence mentioning *-bots.

I wonder whether, even with an omnipotent anticheat software installed, cheating would still be possible by having the router manipulate your packets on the way to the server (ie. having all the *-bot work being done on that device). I imagine TLS could maybe thwart that attempt, since the router can’t decrypt the packets, but I don’t think it’s really a problem since the client could also just provide it with the unencrypted packet and the server’s public key, so that the router may fabricate the packets. On the other hand, anticheat software would be aware of that since the client has to send those extra packets, but how could it know that those packets are being sent for nefarious purposes and not just simply some other normal software doing it’s thing?

I should note that there’s also the option to simply save a post or comment (the star in the web interface). It can then be found under “Saved” on your user page.