They’re complaining that their admission of being wrong was getting downvoted, not about the main post.
They’re complaining that their admission of being wrong was getting downvoted, not about the main post.
I guess it depends on the employer. I don’t do office work myself, but according to what I’ve heard from my wife about her jobs in banking adjacent fields, she has a few different queues of things to do that everyone takes from.
The way you phrased this could go either way: were you never taking on more work, no matter how obviously it needed to get done, just because you weren’t explicitly told to do that job? Because that would be a fair criticism in my estimation.
That’s not what they are saying at all. They’re saying small vehicles aren’t even safe in crashes with other small vehicles, let alone with bigger vehicles.
Mind explaining why?
Obviously, it would still be stacked against the employee, but the biggest thing would be that the person under investigation could sue the law firm and hurt the law firm and their client through social media or by encouraging unionization if there was any proof of misconduct during the investigation.
Why is this news?
Correct me if I’m wrong, but that was only one user who made that comparison, and they got downvoted hard for that.
Just because you shouldn’t trust them doesn’t mean you’re not allowed to interact with them. It just means you need to be careful.
deleted by creator
This seems to imply that the hacks were done through Apex itself and not through Easy Anti Cheat like everyone was speculating.
While I am sceptical of rootkit based anti-cheat as well, I am also not a fan of how quickly everyone has jumped to assuming this is EAC’s problem and not a problem with Apex Legends, is there some solid evidence for that that I’m just unaware of?
Is there any evidence that it was a hack of EAC and not of Apex Legends itself?
“Only” 1 in a hundred Americans are PhDs? Thats far higher than I would have expected.
A few things to remember to add:
That’s neat but it also seems a bit bulky.
Actually, it isn’t so much a matter of being rich vs being poor as it is the level of inequality that influences generosity. People who have more are about as likely as those who have less to be generous when inequality is low, and according to some studies they are actually even more likely to do so. But when inequality is high then the generosity of the wealthy decreases.
You are technically correct but only if you are loose with how you define chemtrails.
I got that reference! Surprised to see it out in the wild.