I’m saying under fascism people will conform whether they believe in the cause or not for fear of death. We don’t know anything about this family and saying they are Nazis celebrating a bright future may be far from the actual circumstances.

This family could pass for Jewish. Maybe they just didn’t want to die.

While this is neat, the person who cares about this is going to keep their car longer than 5 years.

The insurance policy would cover a fire but not disease?

It will be felt most by those least responsible.

Everyday Palestinians? What genius propagandist came up with that one? Israel doesn’t seem to make the distinction.

Yes but our current society vests power in the corporation doing the killing. It’s a problem as old as civilization, but one we still haven’t solved. The problem is that these institutions and the technology they wield has never been greater.

That’s a lot of money we’re spending because of Netanyahu’s crazed bloodlust.

*before they can own shares

When every company is a democracy you might have a point, but until then you’re talking about eliminating the one oversight management has.

Welcome to America

That’s a good thing.

Why would you intentionally look at this complex situation in 1 dimension. That dimension being the most overplayed talked about dimension because it creates conflict between groups based on identities. Instead of looking at the actual problem that the dimension completely ignores.

What is a liberal space for men? That means nothing.

Perpetuates the false dichotomy of a linear political spectrum of either liberal or conservative and that in and of itself is one of the reasons for these trends. Liberalism has nothing to offer men. Leftism does.

You might as well be asking men how much they are willing to sacrifice for others vs. look after their own interests. When the inequality gap widens and the majority live below average economically, don’t you think people will tend to become more selfish? That’s all these charts show.

Conservatism is essentially synonymous with patriarchy and on a very shallow level, it’s easy to see how men would choose that over the status quo. That will surely be better for men than this slow attrition of status that comes with ever increasing wealth concentration. This isn’t true but it is an obvious conclusion.

The real question, which this survey completely ignores, conveniently, is what we should all be doing together to better the status quo for all. Because I believe almost everyone except a small and shrinking fraction agrees that current trends are not working for anyone.

Hence my qualifier “substantially”

No. He’s not substantially different than a mainstream Dem.

Trump will never have the political capital to do anything with Alaska. It’s just not on the table, even for him, regardless of the lemmings he has following him. He will have political capital to withdraw from Ukraine and cede that to Russia however and that’s all Putin could ask for.

Putin is just trying to create a distraction as always.

They are being financed by China and India. Their long time prospects are pretty terrible because they will rack up massive debts to those countries. But I suspect they will be able to continue the war longer than Ukraine can stay politically favored in the West. If Trump is elected, it’s over for Ukraine.