There is no section 15 or 16 in GPLv3, but I did find section 7 saying:

Requiring preservation of specified reasonable legal notices or author attributions in that material or in the Appropriate Legal Notices displayed by works containing it; or

But that’s an optional thing that you must add onto the GPLv3 license. I’ll have to keep that in mind for the future.

That would explain why what I’ve read mentioned it’s not guaranteed in GPLv3 (when comparing to MIT). I’ll have to figure out what that notice would look like.

GPL has no requirements for author attribution which is contrary to the entire point of an MIT license.

That’s why I described it as joining the Borg. You release individualism and freely give it to the collective. That’s cool, and I get the ethos behind all that, but I don’t want to add any of those constraints to my code. I just don’t want credit for my work or the others to get lost. I don’t think it’s a hard ask.

Regardless, we ended up ultimately being a full replacement for the other project.

I don’t care if people make money to use my code. I just want my name attached to it somehow, even if you make it closed sourced which is MIT and OpenBSD. I hope you do use my code and even if you heavily reference it to make something new, carry that forward so more can learn and benefit.

I also don’t understand “better for the end user” arguments either. I have a library that people want to be included in another project, but that project is GPL. They won’t merge my code unless I change my code to be GPL. So everyone who wants them merged is out of luck. I can’t merge their code either with mine. What is supposed to happen is I freely give up my name to the code and restrict it to only being GPL and for GPL projects. Essentially, assimilate and join with the Borg. No, thanks.

And while that’s from my experience, I’ve also seen good projects get traction, have excitement over it, and fall off the earth because they end up making it GPL. Everyone interested in adopting it, personal or business, just disappear. Then something with less restrictions comes along and gets adopted.

End-users move to what’s better for them, and if you have a library that is only for GPL, you can end up limiting your options with a wasteful purity test. If you want it to be free you’d give freely with no restrictions. And if you think, “You can contact me to discuss licensing” that doesn’t happen. It’s still a restriction and almost nobody actually bothers.

You left out the hundred of lines from the library you’re importing. Where’s all the code for robotparser?

You can import libraries with C# too. That says nothing about the differences between languages.

deleted by creator

Wow, you think Teslas are “Chinese EVs”. You’re literally the first person I’ve encountered to think so. Also why lead into an article with a graphic of the least selling vehicle?

Doesn’t stop it from being misleading.

It’s called “burying the lede”.

In China. But the majority of Teslas are manufactured are in China, and no one really considers Teslas “Chinese cars” or “Chinese EVs”.

Well, I feel misled. The graphic shows a Volvo as a Chinese manufactured vehicle.

Sales of Chinese made EVs in Australia

• Tesla - 46,116
• BYD - 12,438
• MG - 5,928
• Volvo - 3,949

They’re counting Tesla as a Chinese EV.

Pravo

The Who were kinda silly (eg: Boris the Spider) in their early years.

I have a PS5. Got FF7:Remake the minute it came out. Now I’m in a position where I want to play Rebirth so much I want to experience it on my best device, my PC.

It appears as though they did not like to gamble.

Somebody face-swap them all.

Judkins said that after the finger test, a lead cybertruck engineer at Tesla said he did the video wrong.

Timestamp in UTC

But for time of day, use local time and store separate column with the timezone name. Don’t use timezone offsets since that doesn’t work with DST. You’re better off with something like America/New_York because God knows what 2030 will look like.

And if timezone are abolished, or DST, that’s even more reason to store the timezone name.

The entire Material Design framework in JS and Web Components in 80kb

https://clshortfuse.github.io/materialdesignweb/components/buttons.html

JS and Web Components are not the problem. Poor design is.

OP, can I get a tagged version of this so I can freely send it around while properly crediting your work?

Yeah, that’s a big simplification and I get it. But the async syntax itself syntax “sugar” for Promises. It’s not like C# or Java/Android where it will spawn a thread. If you take a JSON of 1000 rows and attach a promise/await to each of them, you won’t hit the next event loop until they all run to completion.

It’s a common misconception that asynchronous means “run in background”. It doesn’t. It means run at end of current call stack.

Prior to that, the browser had window.setTimeout and its callback for delays and animation and such - but that’s it.

And you STILL have to call setTimeout in your async executions or else you will stall your UI.

Again async is NOT background. It’s run later. async wraps Promise which wraps queueMicrotask.

Here is a stack overflow that explains it more in detail.

Preventing the ui thread from waiting on native IO is what async was created for.

Citation needed. async just a wrapper for Promises. IO isn’t related, just commonly used with it.

https://tc39.es/ecma262/multipage/control-abstraction-objects.html#sec-async-functions-abstract-operations-async-function-start

NodeJS’s IO and fetch are just promises. (And NodeJS used to use callback(err, response) before adding promises.).