• 0 Posts
  • 33 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: September 15th, 2023

help-circle


  • I know a lot of people don’t like the American First Past the Post system, but to be honest, even in a proportional system like here in the Netherlands, you end up with very similar dynamics.

    Truth is, progressives are always a small minority, in every country. Because they are always ahead of the curve on change.

    In the US, this means that you only get a handful of progressives in the most progressive districts and never a really progressive national government.

    In the Netherlands, this means progressives are always represented, but need to compromise to form a government. And often, they even get skipped and the centrist and conservative parties form a coalition.

    Truth be told, Biden is as progressive as you could hope to get in the USA.

    And, while I do think it is important to criticize him - and even threaten to not vote for him - to enable him to move more towards the left, it is also important to vote for him.

    Progressives always win, not through getting majorities, but because they have the right ideas and eventually the other parties catch up to them.

    For recent examples, gay marriage in the USA or marihuana legalization are now law in the USA.

    I am 100% confident that American policy on Israel will also shift thanks to progressive voices. And it will not require a progressive majority.




  • For decades, Israel and the US (and European countries) have pursued a policy to destabilize middle eastern regimes.

    People don’t realize this, but there was a wave of Arab nationalism that was killed by sponsoring Islamic extremists. Had that not happened, the middle east would be much more secular today than it is.

    Israel attacking and destabilizing Lebanon and Syria and the US maintaining a dictator in Egypt are part of this strategy.

    In turn, this leads to hate towards the West and Israel by the Muslims affected.

    It won’t stop as long as American voters care much more about gas prices than about human rights. American politicians are willing to sponsor genocide to have some control on oil prices in order to win elections.



  • There will always be winners and losers with any change.

    Plantation owners definitely lost a lot of wealth due to the abolition of slavery, while the industrial tycoons gained a lot of wealth.

    Switching away from fossil fuels will similarly benefit those who invest in the energy sources and technologies of the future, while shrinking the fortune of those dependent on fossil fuels.

    Already, some forms of fossil energy are losing new investment.

    For example, the high profile Keystone XL pipeline was never built, even though Trump approved it, because investors doubted its profit potential. Biden revoking the permit was mostly symbolic.

    Now, I do otherwise agree with this more nuanced take of yours. Morality needs to be aligned with financial incentives in order to achieve change. That’s just how our current world works and I don’t see that basic mechanism changing.

    So it makes more sense to focus on making fossil fuels less profitable, e.g. through taxation.





  • It’s unlikely that the details will be known before an agreement is reached.

    But to your point, what really matters is whether the USA will force Israel to accept the proposal, or if the Israeli population protests harder against Netanyahu (but that’s unlikely to reach the required mass).

    Netanyahu wants the war to continue and will not accept any deal, unless his hand is forced.

    Anyway, Israel was telling people to flee Rafah. My local news says they are probably doing that to pressure Hamas by panicking the Gazan population.

    So, no, I don’t think Israel will accept the deal.








  • I didn’t think I’d find a mercantilist in 2024, but here we are.

    No, that’s not how it works, otherwise the US would be a poor country based on their massive trade deficit.

    Trade takes place because it is mutually beneficial. Each parties gets something out of each trade.

    Reducing trade therefore will always hurts both countries.

    Exactly which loses more will depend on a lot of factors, but in general smaller economies are more dependent on larger economies.