![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
I didn’t even touch on all the deforestation
the paper does, and it’s deeply flawed. no one should trust these over simplifications of our vastly complex agricultural systems.
I didn’t even touch on all the deforestation
the paper does, and it’s deeply flawed. no one should trust these over simplifications of our vastly complex agricultural systems.
that’s without accounting for the feed
it’s not, and the methodology is flawed.
true propaganda is still propaganda and serves a political agenda.
oh that we could convince liberals this is true.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
icewind dale
homeworld
fftactics (I beat the final boss but I overlooked the side quest to master summoner)
i wouldn’t rely on poore-nemecek 2018 for the chemical makeup of co2, let alone weighing ghg emissions from various sources.
ia already serves all their uploads as torrents
the sources on that paper are labyrinthine, but i recall pulling up the water use for cattle out of it, and they attributed all of the water used in the production of all the food given to cattle to the production of the cattle, which might make sense if you don’t think about it for even a few seconds more. we know that there are things that we grow that we use, and then discard other parts. maybe crop “seconds”; that is things that we grew thinking we would eat it but we pulled it to early or too late or mashed it up pretty bad during harvest or whatever. we are actually conserving water use by feeding these things to cattle, but it isn’t credited to cattle, it’s counted against their total water use.
that was just the water use for california dairy cattle. if even 10% of the study is done this sloppily, how much do you trust that study?
that image is based on poore-nemecek 2018 which has terrible methodology.
…I don’t have to like it.
where do you think the equator is?
this entire conflict has to be one of very few in history where one side is actively trying to increase the suffering on their own side as a weapon of war and manipulation
this is how all asymmetric warfare works. the Boston tea party was meant to provoke a response.
there is a cure for political illiteracy
socialism has nothing to do with taxes
The raw energy approach is actually quite a good approach by now, because we can use technology to transition most things into each other.
this assumes some sort of centralized economy, instead of letting farmers give wasted apples to their neighbors horses or whatever.
that has never happened.