What’s this in reference to?
What’s this in reference to?
Why is this YSK material?
Plus we can like both.
Yup! Three dots, but the second menu doesn’t have undo either.
It’s gotta be it, man.
I see an identical menu minus the undo. Fail. Oh well.
What phone do you have?
Well fuck me! Mine doesn’t have that. Do you have a Pixel?
Got it. Thanks.
I was referring to the “so unusable” part. But ok.
What makes it unusable?
And instead of saying “let’s twit about it,” you say “let’s osm about it!”
Such an unhelpful comment.
Let’s see if that’s true.
Nope. Couldn’t find it.
Not saying you’re lying, but it’s not available on my version of gboard.
Which is exactly my point. It’s not CG, the technology, that’s expensive. It’s the human factor surrounding it.
Hmmmm… if a movie starts with stupid plot points in the first few minutes, and not in an ironic/satirical way (e.g. “I’m alone in a park - what’s that noise in the dark? Let’s investigate!” or “Everyone is carrying a gun. I’ll fight them with my katana sword!”) then I kind of know what I’m getting myself into for the rest of the movie.
Same deal.
Not that I think that CGI is cheap, but spending millions in computer graphics with today’s powerful hardware sounds absurd. So, something else must be it.
Hey thanks for explaining!
What did you learn?
Freaking autocorrect and its bad habits!
overstay its* welcome
Ha, cool! It’s been a while since I saw that movie.
Man, 1998?! Time flies.