Simple, I choose EveryMan’s superpower from The Simpsons
Simple, I choose EveryMan’s superpower from The Simpsons
Lawnchair can hide, rename and change icons of app starters.
Any VPN app can be turned on from the notification short cuts or atleast WireGuard and Windscribe can.
deleted by creator
On desktop all browsers should be able to save Websites as HTML or PDF. Firefox on Android also offers “printing” sites to PDF.
By prolonging the anti retroviral therapy (with a regime containing a Reverse Transcriptase or Ingetrase Inhibitor) for a certain time after the CRISPR-Cas treatment should lead to the complete elimination of the viral DNA, comparable to PrEP in un-infected individuals.
International law isn’t natural law, with advances in knowledge it can and should change.
Sustainability of a business strategy? But wouldn’t that cost them those sweet short term gains?
No, most schools I knew through friends or after school clubs where 3+ floors. I guess single floor schools would have seemed odd to me because everything is so far apart.
You overestimate most peoples tech skills. They will never know because they have auto-updates activated.
You don’t have to learn English to code but it’s way easier.
Telegram is a shell company and only offers mediocre, opt-in encryption. The thing I like most about them is their support for 3rd party clients.
I have to use their service for some contacts same as with WhatsApp but I would prefer more secure and privacy friendly alternatives.
I’m not saying that WhatsApp is the good guy here, Meta sucks but compared to Telegram I rather trust them if I have to.
And the unencrypted backups are only problematic when you use the automatic Google Drive upload.
WhatsApp’s e2e encryption is based on the Signal protocol and active by default. Telegram’s is opt-in. So much for Telegram’s superior privacy…
I go with a literal definition. Being able to identify the thought of a random stranger without calibration or them focussing on one specific thought.
Don’t get me wrong, this is great for people who are unable to communicate otherwise. But in the end it is still an interpretation and therefore not error-proof.
I wasn’t thinking of science fiction at all.
But this isn’t mind reading (which is impossible) it’s a statistical model giving the most likely answer based on an EEG.
This buzzword labeled bunch of algorithms isn’t reading minds, it’s interpreting ones EEG.
Sensationalist headlines are a strong indicator of crap articles.
The active agents? No. The behavior resulting from relative safety against HIV? Yes.
Because PrEP users tend to give up on other preventive measures like condoms.
EndeavourOS twice on the list?