xXthrowawayXx [none/use name]

Yeah. It’s real good. I wish we were federated with more instances, but thats a process and will take time.

Also if the normal invocation of your program produces more than 3k lines of stdout, sanitize it and default to a file.

Only if your fifteen minute comment recorded during the morning commute is transcribed by the most limited speech to text system possible and put as alt text.

Lockdown mode stops it.

You’re cutting off your nose to spite your face under the mistaken belief that voting with your dollar is effective.

Consider tracking mitigation techniques as opposed to the boycott.

No it’s bad.

E: anti wayland, anti pulseaudio, anti systemd, pro xscreensaver.

It would be cool to give whales guns and just see what happens.

Like the ocean version of when you give a monkey a gun.

Of course I’m not asking. I’m responding to your assertion that after 2015 azov wasn’t spreading nazism. They clearly were both incubating and spreading it during that time. I chose the example most apropos to our discussion and brought up their semiotics. You said it (without specification) wasn’t a nazi symbol and I asked which of the two nazi symbols wasn’t one.

So, stop providing cover for the spread of Nazism. Stop defending Nazis.

Now how many Nazis can a group have before the wolfsangel is a problem? We agree that Nazis use it as a dogwhistle, we agree that in the context of a far right militia it’s clearly Nazi imagery. Is it half? If your group is half Nazis you get a pass? One quarter? One singular Nazi? I’d argue that since the context is a far right militia that just fucking last year claimed to have “denazified” the number is zero. You can’t use the same imagery you used last year to appeal to Nazis and credibly claim that it’s different now.

I say that because I’m not gullible and I don’t defend Nazis.

What’s not a Nazi symbol, the wolfsangel (which you agreed was a Nazi symbol in the context of a right wing militia just a few days ago) or the black sun (whose removal you claimed was semiotic denazification enough)?

Instead of making me dredge up terrible things you’ve said, why not just stop defending Nazis?

What would you call wearing and waving a Nazi symbol?

Stop defending Nazis!

I’m not trivializing anything.

You are saying that azov battalion using the wolfsangel is not a nazi symbol.

It’s a defense of Nazis because you’re providing cover for the spread of their ideology. You need to stop defending Nazis.

Okay first things first, I never said Russia was controlled by its enemies, second:

This isn’t about my views on geopolitics, it’s about ohs you need to stop defending Nazis. Do that and we can have a wide ranging conversation about any number of topics.

But first, stop defending Nazis!

They’re both liberal fascist states. One was put in place by nato after they realized they couldn’t just carve it up, the other was put in place by nato to oppose the first when they denied it membership.

Stop deflecting and trying to place me in support or opposition to the members of this absolutely avoidable conflict and most importantly: stop defending nazis.

Take that same exact page and recognize that if there’s ten liberals at the table with a Nazi there’s eleven Nazis at the table.

An organization that accepts Nazis is a Nazi organization.

I’m not trivializing the fact that the ukranian state actively welcomes Nazis. I’m responding appropriately with revulsion and disdain.

To the extent that there is any path to peace that leaves Donetsk and Luhansk in the control of the ukranian state, it does not hinge on accepting and welcoming Nazis.

If the state is doing so, it’s not out of necessity, but alignment.

There is no argument to be won here. Anyone reading this thread of comments will wonder why it’s so important that Nazis are accepted. I’m recommending you, as a person who ought to be familiar with the insidious nature of fascism, stop defending Nazis.

See this is why I keep pushing you.

Germany would never do what the ukranian state is doing, but they need every fighting man. Never mind the fact that ukranian doctrine has been combined arms warfare with relatively small numbers of soldiers so they’re not actually in a situation where numbers are a huge benefit.

The naziism is a serious problem and it’s good that azov “denazified” but also they’re not popular and it’s no big deal.

They can’t capitalize on having fought and aren’t gaining any standing, but azov was being lauded in the press as defenders of Mariupol.

You’re just saying whatever let’s you keep defending the Nazis.

Now it could be that you want to defend the ukranian state, but you don’t need to rush to its side every time. It can be making grave mistakes and doing the wrong thing by any measure and still be a state you support. Just don’t support the Nazis, that’s all I ask.

Take a page from the communists and limit yourself to critical support.

You’d have a good point if the ukranian state was doing some kind of gloryless Suicide charge with them. Based on all they’ve said they’re integrating the Nazi militia into the state to fight alongside normal people and become war heroes.

Stop finding excuses to defend Nazis.

Oh so you’re defending specifically the nazis fighting Russia.

Interesting stance for a German to take. 🤔

You can, as always, stop defending Nazis.

Oh so if they’re good Nazis it’s okay!

I see now why you’re defending them, you think it’s okay!

Stop defending Nazis!

Oh it’s only 1/5 Nazis! In that case they get to use the wolfsangel but they can’t use the totenkopf until they hit 1/8.

This is absurd. They were Nazis, they used a symbol to appeal to Nazis. The name became synonymous with Nazis. Now the claim is they’re only 1/5 Nazis but it’s okay to use the same symbol and name.

At this point what would convince you? If their marches included the Bellamy salute? If they brought the black sun back?

You’re either so naive you can’t recognize the “new look, same great taste” strategy or you’re defending Nazis. I’ve been assuming the latter because the former is both sad and frightening.

So you trust the ukranian state not to be fascist so much that you’ll take their word that there aren’t any Nazis over their actions of leaving the dogwhistle symbol and very well known name.

That’s going way beyond gullible, but if you’re willing to look past the ukranian states’ past actions and take it at its word who am I to judge? I mean, as a German you definitely have plenty of success and skill in recognizing Nazis and keeping them out of power: just look at nato and the frg of olde and afd etc today! Clearly Germans can recognize Nazis and effectively keep them out of power! What was I thinking suggesting that a German was being pedantic and providing a smokescreen for Nazis? There’s no systemic historical precedent for that!

Stop defending Nazis.