minnix@lemux.minnix.dev to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 8 months agoDo you think banning end-to-end encryption is plausible? Think again.github.comexternal-linkmessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up1231arrow-down17
arrow-up1224arrow-down1external-linkDo you think banning end-to-end encryption is plausible? Think again.github.comminnix@lemux.minnix.dev to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square28fedilink
minus-squarephase@lemmy.8th.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·8 months agoI find this article more complex than it should. For me the logic is more basic: You want to ban encryption? So no https so no banking online.
minus-squareChahk@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up7·8 months agoThey don’t want to outright ban encryption. They want to force communication providers to build in backdoors. And not tell you about them.
minus-squarephase@lemmy.8th.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·8 months agoBanking regulation is going to freak out with this. Tracking this risk which has to be kept hidden can only be fun.
I find this article more complex than it should. For me the logic is more basic:
You want to ban encryption? So no https so no banking online.
They don’t want to outright ban encryption. They want to force communication providers to build in backdoors. And not tell you about them.
Banking regulation is going to freak out with this. Tracking this risk which has to be kept hidden can only be fun.