• Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    From the article…

    It did manage, however, to release a truly bizarre app for iOS and Android devices that requires two smartphones or tablets to work. One device displays the game and the other acts as a controller. It’s a weird idea and, according to Kotaku, “one janky piece of crap.”

    The only reason I can think of them doing that is maybe because of CPU overutilization?

    Either that, or they wanted to set one up as a game server, and then have multiple phones be the clients. They just forgot to add the feature to let the server run locally on the client.

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

    • Glowstick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      For many many years even low end Android phones can perfectly run emulated game systems that came out a decade or two after atari, so cpu probably isn’t a bottleneck at all

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        For many many years even low end Android phones can perfectly run emulated game systems that came out a decade or two after atari, so cpu probably isn’t a bottleneck at all

        Yeah, I kind of agree, but I just threw it out there as a possibility, as maybe their code base is really bad and non-performant.

        Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)